Statement from the UK science community on global warming

On the Met Office website is a statement, I presume in response to the emails leaked from UEA, that reads

We, members of the UK science community, have the utmost confidence in the observational evidence for global warming and the scientific basis for concluding that it is due primarily to human activities. The evidence and the science are deep and extensive. They come from decades of painstaking and meticulous research, by many thousands of scientists across the world who adhere to the highest levels of professional integrity. That research has been subject to peer review and publication, providing traceability of the evidence and support for the scientific method.

The science of climate change draws on fundamental research from an increasing number of disciplines, many of which are represented here. As professional scientists, from students to senior professors, we uphold the findings of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which concludes that ‘Warming of the climate system is unequivocal’ and that ‘Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations’.

It is signed, in a personal capacity, by over 1700 people representing 120 UK academic institutions.

You can read the full list of signatories here. I’d post it here but at one name per line it goes on for forty pages.

Next time someone says that the UEA emails damage the evidence for climate change, you can ask them if the vast left-wing conspiracy includes all of the people who signed the statement and all the institutions listed below the fold.

xD.

Organisations that have said that humans are having a deleterious effect on the climate, or words to that effect:

The national science academies of Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, the Caribbean, China, France, Ghana, Germany, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, India, Japan, Kenya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, New Zealand, Russia, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Sweden, Tanzania, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States, Zambia & Zimbabwe, The US Global Change Research Program, the International Arctic Science Committee, the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, the InterAcademy Council, the International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences, the Network of African Science Academies, the Royal Society of New Zealand, the Polish Academy of Sciences, the US National Research Council, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the European Science Foundation, the Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies, the American Geophysical Union, the European Federation of Geologists, the European Geosciences Union, the Geological Society of America, the Geological Society of Australia, the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, the American Meteorological Society, the Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, the Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, the UK Royal Meteorological Society, the World Meteorological Organisation, the American Quaternary Association, the International Union for Quaternary Research, the American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians, the American Society for Microbiology, the Australian Coral Reef Society, the UK Institute of Biology, the Society of American Foresters, the Wildlife Society, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Preventive Medicine, the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, the Australian Medical Association, the World Federation of Public Health Associations, the World Health Organisation, the American Astronomical Society, the American Chemical Society, the American Institute of Physics, the American Physical Society, the American Statistical Association, the Institution of Engineers Australia and the International Association for Great Lakes Research.

3 thoughts on “Statement from the UK science community on global warming

  1. Pingback: Twitted by Psythor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.